Targeted by numerous complaints, Google denies any anti-competitive practices

As Google is the subject of several antitrust cases across the Atlantic, Google is counterattacking. In a request to Judge Amit Mehta, who is in charge of these cases, the Mountain View firm asks him dismissing two complaints against him and confirming that they are not valid.

Google defends its contracts with other tech giants

The first and largest lawsuit is the one filed by the Department of Justice and 11 states against Google in late 2020. It specifically targets the company’s search engine and the enormous monopoly it exercises through alleged anti-competitive practices. According to the complainants, the company has spent billions of dollars along with other tech giants to be the search engine of choice on browsers and electronic devicesunfairly prevents its competitors from thriving.

In the same category

Microsoft reportedly considered buying Figma

In his document, consulted by The edge and which constitutes an overview of the arguments that could be put forward during the trial, if the trials are not dismissed, the company assures that the complaint misrepresents its agreements with browser developers and Android smartphone manufacturers : ” To require Google not to engage in fierce competition – or to require browser developers to redesign their products and give their customers a worse experience – would be tantamount to undermining competition law “, she explains.

She also states that its agreements with Mozilla and Apple to integrate Search into their respective browsers in no way prevent users from using alternatives. It also confirms that if browsers select Google Search, this is simply a result of it outperforming its rivals. ” There is no evidence to suggest that Google forced Apple, Mozilla, or any other browser developer to adopt a design that included a single default search engine says the company.

A trial possible already in September

The other complaint that Google hopes to overturn with Judge Mehta also dates from late 2020. Filed by several states led by Colorado, it also claims that the company signs exclusive contracts to establish its dominant position and prevent users from going to its competitorsas well as forcing professionals to use their advertising tools. The Mountain View company would have used the same tactic with linked object brands of all kinds that use Google Search technology. The company denies these accusations and assures that they are baseless.

If all goes as planned, the trial between the web giant and the Department of Justice should take place in September. Its implications are colossal for Google, as it could lead to the liquidation of part of its activities. Other lawsuits, targeting its advertising activities, are also underway in the United States.

Google’s practice has already been sanctioned in Europe. The competition authority of the old continent fined it 4 billion euros for forcing manufacturers of smartphones running Android to use Google Search.

Leave a Comment