Life insurance, retirement savings plan: the product that pays the most according to your profile

When it comes to savings, every detail matters. Your investment horizon, the risk you are prepared to bear, the level of fees deducted, the performance of the contract and the taxation that applies to it must in particular feed your reflection. To choose the product that best suits your expectations, you can of course have competition between contracts in order to subscribe to a profitable product with low costs. Note in this respect that, since June 1, insurers and distributors of life insurance and retirement savings plans (PER) have the obligation to present all the costs levied on the contracts offered in a summary table available on their website.

>> Our service – Test our life insurance comparator

But, in view of retirement, a first question arises: is it in your interest to take out life insurance or a retirement savings plan? Beyond the performance expected from products that are similar in many respects, since the overwhelming majority of PERs are based on the life insurance model, a major difference should be noted between the two envelopes: their taxation, in particular when from a one-time purchase to retirement.

Two envelopes, two taxes separately during the redemption

On life insurance taken out for more than eight years, the gains made support at least the social contributions of 17.2%. They are also subject to a flat-rate deduction of 12.8% (7.5% for premiums paid before September 27, 2017), with an annual allowance on interest of 4,600 euros for a single person or 9,200 euros for a couple. .

On the PER side, the payments are – optionally – deductible from taxable income. Then, when the plan is redeemed, that is to say when the pension is liquidated, this capital is taxed at the marginal tax bracket (TMI). Capital gains are subject to a single flat-rate levy (PFU) at the rate of 30%, a “flat tax” (17.2% social security contributions + 12.8% flat-rate levy). But the subscriber can also choose, when it is profitable for him, to be taxed on his capital gains up to social security contributions of 17.2% as well as his marginal tax bracket (TMI). He then benefits from the deductibility of part of the CSG (6.8%).

In short, two tax envelopes with two very different tax regimes. For life insurance, reduced taxation on gains made throughout the life of the contract. For the retirement savings plan, a particularly interesting entry tax advantage when your marginal tax bracket decreases on retirement, for example if your TMI drops from 30% to 11%. But not only, since the PER contains a tax interest of its own, in the form of a cash advance, or rather a “zero rate loan”. Because even if your TMI does not change on retirement, your deductible payments produce interest throughout the lifetime of the PER, which will boost your capital and boost the profitability of your investment.

But as often, the figures are much more telling than these theoretical explanations. We therefore asked Eres, a specialist in retirement and employee savings, to carry out several simulations. While each of the profiles studied differs, certain assumptions do not change, mainly for the sake of simplicity and understanding. Thus, for life insurance as for a PER, we have chosen to retain an investment period of 25 years and an annual return net of management fees but gross of taxation of 3%, with an allocation distributed at 50% on the euro fund and 50% in units of account (UA). For the PER, the saver chooses each time the deductibility of the payments. At the end of the investment period – ie at the end of retirement – the two envelopes are redeemed in capital at once.

Profile 1: single with 35,000 euros in income, 1,000 euros invested each year

First profile-type chosen: a single person with 35,000 euros of net taxable income, which places him in the marginal tax bracket of 30%. He invests 1,000 euros each year in a retirement savings plan. A net investment since this sum is deducted from his net taxable income. On the other hand, if he opts for life insurance, only 700 euros are actually invested, the TMI of 30% applying to the 1,000 euros.

After 25 years, with an annual return of 3%, the savings accumulated on each envelope differ logically. Indeed – and it is useful to insist on this point -, it is 1,000 euros which are invested each year on the PER, against “only” 700 euros on life insurance. Result: gross savings of 37,553 euros in total on the PER, against 26,287 euros on life insurance.

Two scenarios are to be studied during the redemption to determine the savings net of taxation of our single person. His tax bracket may be identical to his TMI in force during the payments (30%), or may have dropped to 11%.

At constant TMI, the taxation that hits the PER, i.e. the TMI of 30% on payments and the PFU of 30% on capital gains, reaches 11,266 euros. On the life insurance side, only interest is subject to social security contributions of 17.2%, for a total tax of 1,511 euros. Net of tax, the capital recovered on the PER is then displayed at 26,287 euros, against 24,776 euros on life insurance. The retirement savings plan thus yields 1,511 euros more than life insurance, ie an additional capital gain compared to life insurance of 9% ((1,511/(25 x 700)).

>> Our service – Compare the performance of retirement savings plans (PER) with our simulator

A differential that increases significantly if the income of our single person declines at retirement and pushes him into the marginal tax bracket at 11%. No impact for life insurance, the taxation applicable to interest not depending on the TMI. It is quite different for the PER, since taxation on capital (payments) is reduced to the tune of this TMI, and capital gains are taxed with social security contributions and, optionally, at this TMI. Along with the benefit of a CSG deductible on these capital gains of 6.8%. Thus, while the gain made on life insurance does not change, that made on the PER climbs. Savings net of tax reached 31,537 euros, for a comparative advantage of 6,581 euros against life insurance. Translation: with a total savings effort of 17,500 euros, or 700 euros for 25 years, the PER yields 38% more than life insurance.

eras

Profile 2: single with 80,000 euros in income, 2,000 euros invested each year

Our second typical profile is a single person whose net taxable income of 80,000 euros places him in the TMI of 41%. Comfortable income that allows him to generate an annual savings effort of 2,000 euros, invested in a PER or in life insurance. If he opts for the latter, it is then no longer 2,000 euros that are invested, but only 1,180 euros (2,000 – (2,000 x 0.41)).

After 25 years of savings, and still with an annual return of 3%, gross savings on the PER reached 75,106 euros, against 44,313 euros on life insurance.

Assuming an unchanged tax bracket on retirement, taxation on the PER is displayed at 28,032 euros, for a net value of the envelope of 47,074 euros. On the life insurance side, net savings are limited to 41,765 euros. The difference of 5,309 euros then represents 18% of the total savings effort of 29,500 euros (1,180 x 25).

And this gap takes off at 37%, or 10,809 euros, assuming that our bachelor’s TMI drops to 30%.

eras

Profile 3: couple with 100,000 euros in income, 2,000 euros invested each year

Last profile, that of a couple declaring a net taxable income of 100,000 euros, which places them in the marginal tax bracket of 30%. He can make a savings effort of 2,000 euros on a PER, and 1,400 euros (2,000 – (2,000 x 0.30)) on life insurance.

After 25 years of savings paid 3% per year, the couple finds themselves with a retirement savings plan filled to the tune of 75,106 euros, against 52,574 euros on life insurance.

If he retains his TMI of 30% upon liquidation of the plan, the net value of the PER is displayed at 52,574 euros, against 49,551 euros for life insurance. Once again here, the retirement savings plan brings in more, 3,023 euros exactly. And if the TMI falls to 11% at retirement, the difference soars to 13,162 euros. That is a differential, in comparison with the total savings effort, of 38%. Proof of the tax interest of PER compared to life insurance.

eras

>> Our service – A question about your future retirement? Our partner experts respond to you with a personalized solution

Leave a Comment